<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First look Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview, A brief review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/</link>
	<description>...exploring your Windows world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis A Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis A Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>I downloaded and reviewed MS Office 2010 and I find that I prefer MS Office 2007 over it. I dislike all the crap it loads in startup as I do not intend to upload docs. etc. to the net. As I read earlier; &quot;If Microsoft wanted to improve MS office they SHOULD have!&quot; I think it leaves something to be desired. Apparently they did not upgrade Sharepoint Designer, as it does not work like it does in 2K7. Iit looks as if they worked it over with business, corporations in mind and not thought to the individual user. Oh well I guess I will stick with 2K7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded and reviewed MS Office 2010 and I find that I prefer MS Office 2007 over it. I dislike all the crap it loads in startup as I do not intend to upload docs. etc. to the net. As I read earlier; &#8220;If Microsoft wanted to improve MS office they SHOULD have!&#8221; I think it leaves something to be desired. Apparently they did not upgrade Sharepoint Designer, as it does not work like it does in 2K7. Iit looks as if they worked it over with business, corporations in mind and not thought to the individual user. Oh well I guess I will stick with 2K7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boe</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>boe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase - 

Like Vista - all bling - no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn&#039;t that functional with Office XP - why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don&#039;t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I&#039;m one person and most of my clients don&#039;t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing beneficial for most businesses &#8211; no reason to upgrade/purchase &#8211; </p>
<p>Like Vista &#8211; all bling &#8211; no function.</p>
<p>If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -<br />
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.</p>
<p>2. Full OLE support for pictures in access &#8211; umm wasn&#8217;t that functional with Office XP &#8211; why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?</p>
<p>3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don&#8217;t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I&#8217;m one person and most of my clients don&#8217;t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>thanks RK, nice tutorial there......office 2010 TP looks cool.....and engaged with new features.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks RK, nice tutorial there&#8230;&#8230;office 2010 TP looks cool&#8230;..and engaged with new features&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Amazing damn if i had the net connection at home i would have tryed this this office work sucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing damn if i had the net connection at home i would have tryed this this office work sucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganesh</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Amazing.......i can&#039;t express. 
In past i thought menu bar is compusary for any program but after seeing &lt;strong&gt;Windows 7 RC&lt;/strong&gt; and now &lt;strong&gt;Office 2010 &lt;/strong&gt;screenshots, now my thinking is completely changed.
&lt;strong&gt;Ribbon UI&lt;/strong&gt; would be essential part for future applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing&#8230;&#8230;.i can&#8217;t express.<br />
In past i thought menu bar is compusary for any program but after seeing <strong>Windows 7 RC</strong> and now <strong>Office 2010 </strong>screenshots, now my thinking is completely changed.<br />
<strong>Ribbon UI</strong> would be essential part for future applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweakwindows</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweakwindows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Office 2010 looks promising. Thanks for the nice review.
Btw, WindowsValley  theme is really awesome. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Office 2010 looks promising. Thanks for the nice review.<br />
Btw, WindowsValley  theme is really awesome. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArvindK</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>ArvindK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Awesome look and powerful features. Thanks for review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome look and powerful features. Thanks for review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>wow... video editing in Powerpoint....

Going to try it now ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230; video editing in Powerpoint&#8230;.</p>
<p>Going to try it now ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnandK</title>
		<link>http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>AnandK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsvalley.com/first-look-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview-a-brief-review/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Nice read :) 2010 sure looks good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice read :) 2010 sure looks good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

